| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230525042133.212534-3-davidgow@google.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 12:21:30 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Benjamin Berg <benjamin@...solutions.net>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] kunit: kmalloc_array: Use kunit_add_action()
The kunit_add_action() function is much simpler and cleaner to use that
the full KUnit resource API for simple things like the
kunit_kmalloc_array() functionality.
Replacing it allows us to get rid of a number of helper functions, and
leaves us with no uses of kunit_alloc_resource(), which has some
usability problems and is going to have its behaviour modified in an
upcoming patch.
Note that we need to use kunit_defer_trigger_all() to implement
kunit_kfree().
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Tested-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
---
No changes since v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230518083849.2631178-3-davidgow@google.com/
Changes since v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230421084226.2278282-4-davidgow@google.com/
- Use the kunit_action_t typedef.
- This fixes some spurious checkpatch warnings.
Changes since RFCv2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230331080411.981038-4-davidgow@google.com/
- Update to match changes in the the action API.
- Always allocate the action context with GFP_KERNEL.
- Update documentation to note that this will cause GFP_KERNEL
allocations, regardless of the gfp argument passed in.
---
include/kunit/test.h | 10 +++++++--
lib/kunit/test.c | 48 +++++++++-----------------------------------
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index 3028a1a3fcad..2f23d6efa505 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -324,8 +324,11 @@ enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite);
* @gfp: flags passed to underlying kmalloc().
*
* Just like `kmalloc_array(...)`, except the allocation is managed by the test case
- * and is automatically cleaned up after the test case concludes. See &struct
- * kunit_resource for more information.
+ * and is automatically cleaned up after the test case concludes. See kunit_add_action()
+ * for more information.
+ *
+ * Note that some internal context data is also allocated with GFP_KERNEL,
+ * regardless of the gfp passed in.
*/
void *kunit_kmalloc_array(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t gfp);
@@ -336,6 +339,9 @@ void *kunit_kmalloc_array(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t gfp);
* @gfp: flags passed to underlying kmalloc().
*
* See kmalloc() and kunit_kmalloc_array() for more information.
+ *
+ * Note that some internal context data is also allocated with GFP_KERNEL,
+ * regardless of the gfp passed in.
*/
static inline void *kunit_kmalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
{
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index f5e4ceffd282..d3fb93a23ccc 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -752,58 +752,28 @@ static struct notifier_block kunit_mod_nb = {
};
#endif
-struct kunit_kmalloc_array_params {
- size_t n;
- size_t size;
- gfp_t gfp;
-};
-
-static int kunit_kmalloc_array_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context)
+void *kunit_kmalloc_array(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
{
- struct kunit_kmalloc_array_params *params = context;
+ void *data;
- res->data = kmalloc_array(params->n, params->size, params->gfp);
- if (!res->data)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ data = kmalloc_array(n, size, gfp);
- return 0;
-}
+ if (!data)
+ return NULL;
-static void kunit_kmalloc_array_free(struct kunit_resource *res)
-{
- kfree(res->data);
-}
+ if (kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, (kunit_action_t *)kfree, data) != 0)
+ return NULL;
-void *kunit_kmalloc_array(struct kunit *test, size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
-{
- struct kunit_kmalloc_array_params params = {
- .size = size,
- .n = n,
- .gfp = gfp
- };
-
- return kunit_alloc_resource(test,
- kunit_kmalloc_array_init,
- kunit_kmalloc_array_free,
- gfp,
- ¶ms);
+ return data;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_kmalloc_array);
-static inline bool kunit_kfree_match(struct kunit *test,
- struct kunit_resource *res, void *match_data)
-{
- /* Only match resources allocated with kunit_kmalloc() and friends. */
- return res->free == kunit_kmalloc_array_free && res->data == match_data;
-}
-
void kunit_kfree(struct kunit *test, const void *ptr)
{
if (!ptr)
return;
- if (kunit_destroy_resource(test, kunit_kfree_match, (void *)ptr))
- KUNIT_FAIL(test, "kunit_kfree: %px already freed or not allocated by kunit", ptr);
+ kunit_release_action(test, (kunit_action_t *)kfree, (void *)ptr);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_kfree);
--
2.41.0.rc0.172.g3f132b7071-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists