linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf, net: Support SO_REUSEPORT sockets with bpf_sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7188429a-c380-14c8-57bb-9d05d3ba4e5e@linux.dev>
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2023 16:42:46 -0700
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To:     Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...valent.com>
Cc:     Joe Stringer <joe@...ium.io>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Joe Stringer <joe@...d.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf, net: Support SO_REUSEPORT sockets with
 bpf_sk_assign

On 5/25/23 1:19 AM, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> diff --git a/include/net/inet6_hashtables.h b/include/net/inet6_hashtables.h
> index 56f1286583d3..3ba4dc2703da 100644
> --- a/include/net/inet6_hashtables.h
> +++ b/include/net/inet6_hashtables.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,13 @@ struct sock *__inet6_lookup_established(struct net *net,
>   					const u16 hnum, const int dif,
>   					const int sdif);
>   
> +struct sock *inet6_lookup_reuseport(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
> +				    struct sk_buff *skb, int doff,
> +				    const struct in6_addr *saddr,
> +				    __be16 sport,
> +				    const struct in6_addr *daddr,
> +				    unsigned short hnum);
> +
>   struct sock *inet6_lookup_listener(struct net *net,
>   				   struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo,
>   				   struct sk_buff *skb, int doff,
> @@ -85,14 +92,33 @@ static inline struct sock *__inet6_lookup_skb(struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo,
>   					      int iif, int sdif,
>   					      bool *refcounted)
>   {
> -	struct sock *sk = skb_steal_sock(skb, refcounted);
> -
> +	bool prefetched;
> +	struct sock *sk = skb_steal_sock(skb, refcounted, &prefetched);
> +	struct net *net = dev_net(skb_dst(skb)->dev);
> +	const struct ipv6hdr *ip6h = ipv6_hdr(skb);
> +
> +	if (prefetched) {
> +		struct sock *reuse_sk = inet6_lookup_reuseport(net, sk, skb, doff,

If sk is TCP_ESTABLISHED, I suspect sk->sk_reuseport is 1 (from sk_clone)?

If it is, it should still work other than an extra inet6_ehashfn. Does it worth 
an extra sk->sk_state check or it is overkill?


> +							       &ip6h->saddr, sport,
> +							       &ip6h->daddr, ntohs(dport));