linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZG8lbabbUTko/ZpF@debian>
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2023 11:07:57 +0200
From:   Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:00:37AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   net/ipv4/raw.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   3632679d9e4f ("ipv{4,6}/raw: fix output xfrm lookup wrt protocol")
> 
> from the net tree and commit:
> 
>   c85be08fc4fa ("raw: Stop using RTO_ONLINK.")
> 
> from the net-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc net/ipv4/raw.c
> index eadf1c9ef7e4,8b7b5c842bdd..000000000000
> --- a/net/ipv4/raw.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/raw.c
> @@@ -600,9 -596,8 +599,8 @@@ static int raw_sendmsg(struct sock *sk
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> - 	flowi4_init_output(&fl4, ipc.oif, ipc.sockc.mark, tos,
> - 			   RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE,
> + 	flowi4_init_output(&fl4, ipc.oif, ipc.sockc.mark, tos, scope,
>  -			   hdrincl ? IPPROTO_RAW : sk->sk_protocol,
>  +			   hdrincl ? ipc.protocol : sk->sk_protocol,
>   			   inet_sk_flowi_flags(sk) |
>   			    (hdrincl ? FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH : 0),
>   			   daddr, saddr, 0, 0, sk->sk_uid);

Looks good. Thanks!