linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] md/raid10: fix null-ptr-deref of mreplace in raid10_sync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 May 2023 21:55:40 +0800
From:   Li Nan <linan666@...weicloud.com>
To:     Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, linan666@...weicloud.com,
        song@...nel.org, shli@...com, allenpeng@...ology.com,
        alexwu@...ology.com, bingjingc@...ology.com, neilb@...e.de
Cc:     linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com, houtao1@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
        "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] md/raid10: fix null-ptr-deref of mreplace in
 raid10_sync_request



在 2023/5/22 21:01, Yu Kuai 写道:
> Hi,
> 
> 在 2023/05/22 19:54, linan666@...weicloud.com 写道:
>> From: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
>>
>> need_replace will be set to 1 if no-Faulty mreplace exists, and mreplace
>> will be deref later. However, the latter check of mreplace might set
>> mreplace to NULL, null-ptr-deref occurs if need_replace is 1 at this 
>> time.
>>
>> Fix it by merging two checks into one. And replace 'need_replace' with
>> 'mreplace' because their values are always the same.
>>
>> Fixes: ee37d7314a32 ("md/raid10: Fix raid10 replace hang when new 
>> added disk faulty")
>> Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/md/raid10.c | 13 +++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
>> index 4fcfcb350d2b..e21502c03b45 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
>> @@ -3438,7 +3438,6 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev 
>> *mddev, sector_t sector_nr,
>>               int must_sync;
>>               int any_working;
>>               int need_recover = 0;
> 
> need_recover can be removed as well. Otherwise, this patch looks good to
> me.
> 

I agree. Let me improve this in v2.
-- 
Thanks,
Nan