linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] pinctrl: tps6594: Add driver for TPS6594 pinctrl and GPIOs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <CSVF1AQBGQU0.1V5KJP08TCKLT@burritosblues>
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2023 16:07:39 +0200
From:   "Esteban Blanc" <eblanc@...libre.com>
To:     <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        <broonie@...nel.org>, <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <jpanis@...libre.com>, <jneanne@...libre.com>,
        <aseketeli@...libre.com>, <u-kumar1@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] pinctrl: tps6594: Add driver for TPS6594 pinctrl
 and GPIOs

On Tue May 23, 2023 at 9:14 PM CEST,  wrote:
> Mon, May 22, 2023 at 06:31:14PM +0200, Esteban Blanc kirjoitti:
> > TI TPS6594 PMIC has 11 GPIOs which can be used
> > for different functions.
> > 
> > This patch adds a pinctrl and GPIO drivers in
> > order to use those functions.
>
> ...
>
> > +#define FUNCTION(n, g, v)                                                    \
> > +	{                                                                    \
> > +		.pinfunction = PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION((n), (g), ARRAY_SIZE(g)), \
> > +		.muxval = v,                                                 \
> > +	}
>
> It seems you have used SPACEs before \, can you move to TABs?

Once again clang-format is not doing the right thing. Sur I will fix
this.

> > +// Used to compute register address of GPIO1_CONF to GPIO11_CONF
>
> This is good.
>
> > -#define TPS6594_REG_GPIOX_CONF(gpio_inst)		(0x31 + (gpio_inst))
> > +#define TPS6594_REG_GPIOX_CONF(gpio_inst)	(0x31 + (gpio_inst))
>
> But why this?!

Once again, clang-format... I will fix this.

Thanks for your help.
Best regards,

-- 
Esteban Blanc
BayLibre