[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023052646-magnetize-equate-2b24@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 19:54:17 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Tsahee Zidenberg <tsahee@...apurnalabs.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mahé Tardy <mahe.tardy@...valent.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH stable 5.4 0/8] bpf: Fix
bpf_probe_read/bpf_probe_read_str helpers
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:33:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> we see broken access to user space with bpf_probe_read/bpf_probe_read_str
> helpers on arm64 with 5.4 kernel. The problem is that both helpers try to
> read user memory by calling probe_kernel_read, which seems to work on x86
> but fails on arm64.
Has this ever worked on arm64 for the 5.4 kernel tree? If not, it's not
really a regression, and so, why not use a newer kernel that has this
new feature added to it there?
In other words, what requires you to use the 5.4.y tree and requires
feature parity across architectures?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists