linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: Make PR_MDWE_REFUSE_EXEC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABRcYmJDwAuu4_puc43DpzqaA0g9sqGTduDqhnBZBw9BTBtdqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 May 2023 21:02:23 +0200
From:   Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
To:     Alexey Izbyshev <izbyshev@...ras.ru>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, anshuman.khandual@....com,
        joey.gouly@....com, mhocko@...e.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        peterx@...hat.com, broonie@...nel.org, szabolcs.nagy@....com,
        kpsingh@...nel.org, gthelen@...gle.com, toiwoton@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: Make PR_MDWE_REFUSE_EXEC_GAIN an unsigned long

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:58 PM Alexey Izbyshev <izbyshev@...ras.ru> wrote:
>
> My preference would be to keep checking the upper 32 bits. Florent, what
> do you think?

I don't mind. I can do this as part of v3. :)

> > Which raises the question if we want to tag this here with a "Fixes"
> > and eventually cc stable (hmm ...)?
>
> Yes, IMO the faster we propagate this change, the better.

Okay, will do