[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230527005539.5b06df24@mocarz>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 00:55:39 +0200
From: Aleksander Mazur <deweloper@...pl>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] /proc/modules: honor kptr_restrict even without
CONFIG_KALLSYMS
Hi,
Have you had a chance to review my patch?
--
Dnia 2022-06-05, o godz. 22:43:47
Aleksander Mazur <deweloper@...pl> napisaĆ(a):
> Commit e4a8ca3baa55 fixed building without CONFIG_KALLSYMS by providing
> dummy kallsyms_show_value(). Unfortunately -- due to hard-coded "false"
> being returned -- access to addresses in /proc/modules became permanently
> disabled.
>
> My proposal is to change this unconditional "false" to !kptr_restrict.
> This re-enables addresses in /proc/modules even without CONFIG_KALLSYSMS
> unless restricted by means of sysctl (kernel.kptr_restrict).
>
> Fixes: e4a8ca3baa55 ("/proc/module: fix building without kallsyms")
> Signed-off-by: Aleksander Mazur <deweloper@...pl>
> ---
> include/linux/kallsyms.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kallsyms.h b/include/linux/kallsyms.h
> index ad39636e0c3f..cf64f9709f46 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kallsyms.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kallsyms.h
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static inline int lookup_symbol_attrs(unsigned long addr,
> unsigned long *size, u
> static inline bool kallsyms_show_value(const struct cred *cred)
> {
> - return false;
> + return !kptr_restrict;
> }
>
> static inline int kallsyms_on_each_symbol(int (*fn)(void *, const char *,
> struct module *,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists