lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2023 23:54:14 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        dm-devel@...hat.com, elliott@....com, gmazyland@...il.com,
        luto@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        bp@...en8.de, mingo@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, ardb@...nel.org,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, bernie.keany@...el.com,
        charishma1.gairuboyina@...el.com,
        lalithambika.krishnakumar@...el.com, nhuck@...gle.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/12] crypto: x86/aesni - Use the proper data type in
 struct aesni_xts_ctx

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:57:15AM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> +static inline unsigned long aes_align_addr(unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +	return (crypto_tfm_ctx_alignment() >= AESNI_ALIGN) ?
> +	       ALIGN(addr, 1) : ALIGN(addr, AESNI_ALIGN);
> +}

Wouldn't it be simpler to make this take and return 'void *'?  Then the callers
wouldn't need to cast to/from 'unsigned long'.

Also, aligning to a 1-byte boundary is a no-op.

So, please consider the following:

static inline void *aes_align_addr(void *addr)
{
	if (crypto_tfm_ctx_alignment() >= AES_ALIGN)
		return addr;
	return PTR_ALIGN(addr, AES_ALIGN);
}

Also, aesni_rfc4106_gcm_ctx_get() and generic_gcmaes_ctx_get() should call this
too, rather than duplicating similar code.

- Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ