[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHBwLBnKacQCG2/U@corigine.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 10:39:08 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alexis.lothore@...tlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] net: ethernet: altera-tse: Convert to
mdio-regmap and use PCS Lynx
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 09:42:50AM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> The newly introduced regmap-based MDIO driver allows for an easy mapping
> of an mdiodevice onto the memory-mapped TSE PCS, which is actually a
> Lynx PCS.
>
> Convert Altera TSE to use this PCS instead of the pcs-altera-tse, which
> is nothing more than a memory-mapped Lynx PCS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Hi Maxime,
I have some concerns about the error paths in this patch.
...
> @@ -1134,13 +1136,21 @@ static int altera_tse_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> const struct of_device_id *of_id = NULL;
> struct altera_tse_private *priv;
> struct resource *control_port;
> + struct regmap *pcs_regmap;
> struct resource *dma_res;
> struct resource *pcs_res;
> + struct mii_bus *pcs_bus;
> struct net_device *ndev;
> void __iomem *descmap;
> - int pcs_reg_width = 2;
> int ret = -ENODEV;
>
> + struct regmap_config pcs_regmap_cfg;
nit: this probably belongs in with the bunch of declarations above it.
> +
> + struct mdio_regmap_config mrc = {
> + .parent = &pdev->dev,
> + .valid_addr = 0x0,
> + };
nit: maybe this too.
> +
> ndev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(struct altera_tse_private));
> if (!ndev) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not allocate network device\n");
> @@ -1258,10 +1268,29 @@ static int altera_tse_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = request_and_map(pdev, "pcs", &pcs_res,
> &priv->pcs_base);
> if (ret) {
> + /* If we can't find a dedicated resource for the PCS, fallback
> + * to the internal PCS, that has a different address stride
> + */
> priv->pcs_base = priv->mac_dev + tse_csroffs(mdio_phy0);
> - pcs_reg_width = 4;
> + pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_bits = 32;
> + /* Values are MDIO-like values, on 16 bits */
> + pcs_regmap_cfg.val_bits = 16;
> + pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_shift = REGMAP_UPSHIFT(2);
> + } else {
> + pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_bits = 16;
> + pcs_regmap_cfg.val_bits = 16;
> + pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_shift = REGMAP_UPSHIFT(1);
> }
>
> + /* Create a regmap for the PCS so that it can be used by the PCS driver */
> + pcs_regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(&pdev->dev, priv->pcs_base,
> + &pcs_regmap_cfg);
> + if (IS_ERR(pcs_regmap)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(pcs_regmap);
> + goto err_free_netdev;
> + }
> + mrc.regmap = pcs_regmap;
> +
> /* Rx IRQ */
> priv->rx_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "rx_irq");
> if (priv->rx_irq == -ENXIO) {
> @@ -1384,7 +1413,20 @@ static int altera_tse_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> (unsigned long) control_port->start, priv->rx_irq,
> priv->tx_irq);
>
> - priv->pcs = alt_tse_pcs_create(ndev, priv->pcs_base, pcs_reg_width);
> + snprintf(mrc.name, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s-pcs-mii", ndev->name);
> + pcs_bus = devm_mdio_regmap_register(&pdev->dev, &mrc);
> + if (IS_ERR(pcs_bus)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(pcs_bus);
> + goto err_init_phy;
> + }
> +
> + priv->pcs_mdiodev = mdio_device_create(pcs_bus, 0);
mdio_device_create() can fail. Should that be handled here?
> +
> + priv->pcs = lynx_pcs_create(priv->pcs_mdiodev);
> + if (!priv->pcs) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_init_phy;
Does this leak priv->pcs_mdiodev?
> + }
>
> priv->phylink_config.dev = &ndev->dev;
> priv->phylink_config.type = PHYLINK_NETDEV;
> @@ -1407,11 +1449,12 @@ static int altera_tse_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(priv->phylink)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to create phylink\n");
> ret = PTR_ERR(priv->phylink);
> - goto err_init_phy;
> + goto err_pcs;
Does this leak priv->pcs ?
> }
>
> return 0;
> -
> +err_pcs:
> + mdio_device_free(priv->pcs_mdiodev);
> err_init_phy:
> unregister_netdev(ndev);
> err_register_netdev:
> @@ -1433,6 +1476,8 @@ static int altera_tse_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> altera_tse_mdio_destroy(ndev);
> unregister_netdev(ndev);
> phylink_destroy(priv->phylink);
> + mdio_device_free(priv->pcs_mdiodev);
> +
> free_netdev(ndev);
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mdio/mdio-regmap.h b/include/linux/mdio/mdio-regmap.h
> index b8508f152552..679d9069846b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mdio/mdio-regmap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mdio/mdio-regmap.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> #ifndef MDIO_REGMAP_H
> #define MDIO_REGMAP_H
>
> +#include <linux/phy.h>
> +
> struct device;
> struct regmap;
>
This hunk doesn't seem strictly related to the patch.
Perhaps the include belongs elsewhere.
Or the hunk belongs in another patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists