[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y1lbigsr.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 12:27:16 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com,
airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, nathan@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com,
imre.deak@...el.com, arun.r.murthy@...el.com,
lucas.demarchi@...el.com
Cc: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify switch to if-elseif
On Tue, 23 May 2023, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2023, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com> wrote:
>> clang with W=1 reports
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:6012:3: error: unannotated
>> fall-through between switch labels [-Werror,-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
>> case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
>> ^
>>
>> Only one case and the default does anything in this switch, so it should
>> be changed to an if-elseif.
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> If I wanted to fix this quickly, I'd just add the break in there.
I've just applied [1] doing this.
I'm still open to the cleanup suggested below, if you're up for it.
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230524-intel_async_flip_check_hw-implicit-fallthrough-v1-1-83de89e376a1@kernel.org
>
> If I wanted to fix this properly, I'd add a function
> modifier_supports_async_flips() or something, and replace the switch
> with:
>
> if (!modifier_supports_async_flips(i915, new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "[PLANE:%d:%s] Modifier does not support async flips\n",
> plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> But I wouldn't just replace the switch with if-elseif. It doesn't help
> with the overall feeling that intel_async_flip_check_hw() is too long.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 14 +++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index 0490c6412ab5..1f852e49fc20 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -5994,8 +5994,7 @@ static int intel_async_flip_check_hw(struct intel_atomic_state *state, struct in
>> * Need to verify this for all gen9 platforms to enable
>> * this selectively if required.
>> */
>> - switch (new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier) {
>> - case DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR:
>> + if (new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR) {
>> /*
>> * FIXME: Async on Linear buffer is supported on ICL as
>> * but with additional alignment and fbc restrictions
>> @@ -6008,13 +6007,10 @@ static int intel_async_flip_check_hw(struct intel_atomic_state *state, struct in
>> plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> -
>> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
>> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED:
>> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED:
>> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED:
>> - break;
>> - default:
>> + } else if (!(new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED ||
>> + new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
>> + new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED ||
>> + new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED)) {
>> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
>> "[PLANE:%d:%s] Modifier does not support async flips\n",
>> plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists