[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230526171845.698656a5@nowhere>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 17:18:45 +0200
From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
To: Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] sched/deadline: Fix reclaim inaccuracy with SMP
On Fri, 26 May 2023 10:54:09 -0400
Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org> wrote:
[...]
> Sorry for the delay. I was trying to fix the inaccuracy when normal
> and SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM tasks are present. Its a bit complicated than
> I initially thought as Umax_reclaim and Uextra needs to be computed
> at the root domain level and this would mean more locking. I have a
> patch ready but I think I need to do more testing to understand the
> performance implications and it is better to batch it as a separate
> series.
>
> So, I am just sending out the GRUB equation fix which is tested well
> and I am confident about. Will send out rest of the fixes later as
> a separate series.
Looks good to me. And... Thanks again for taking care of this issue!
Luca
Powered by blists - more mailing lists