[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7671b432-569a-d176-315b-d5f66fe205ef@digikod.net>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 18:49:12 +0200
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
Forrest Yuan Yu <yuanyu@...gle.com>,
James Morris <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>,
John Andersen <john.s.andersen@...el.com>,
Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>,
"Madhavan T . Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Marian Rotariu <marian.c.rotariu@...il.com>,
Mihai Donțu <mdontu@...defender.com>,
Nicușor Cîțu <nicu.citu@...oud.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Thara Gopinath <tgopinath@...rosoft.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Zahra Tarkhani <ztarkhani@...rosoft.com>,
Ștefan Șicleru <ssicleru@...defender.com>,
dev@...ts.cloudhypervisor.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, x86@...nel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/9] KVM: x86: Add Heki hypervisor support
On 08/05/2023 23:18, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 05:20:43PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> From: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
>>
>> Each supported hypervisor in x86 implements a struct x86_hyper_init to
>> define the init functions for the hypervisor. Define a new init_heki()
>> entry point in struct x86_hyper_init. Hypervisors that support Heki
>> must define this init_heki() function. Call init_heki() of the chosen
>> hypervisor in init_hypervisor_platform().
>>
>> Create a heki_hypervisor structure that each hypervisor can fill
>> with its data and functions. This will allow the Heki feature to work
>> in a hypervisor agnostic way.
>>
>> Declare and initialize a "heki_hypervisor" structure for KVM so KVM can
>> support Heki. Define the init_heki() function for KVM. In init_heki(),
>> set the hypervisor field in the generic "heki" structure to the KVM
>> "heki_hypervisor". After this point, generic Heki code can access the
>> KVM Heki data and functions.
>>
> [...]
>> +static void kvm_init_heki(void)
>> +{
>> + long err;
>> +
>> + if (!kvm_para_available())
>> + /* Cannot make KVM hypercalls. */
>> + return;
>> +
>> + err = kvm_hypercall3(KVM_HC_LOCK_MEM_PAGE_RANGES, -1, -1, -1);
>
> Why not do a proper version check or capability check here? If the ABI
> or supported features ever change then we have something to rely on?
The attributes will indeed get extended, but I wanted to have a simple
proposal for now.
Do you mean to get the version of this hypercall e.g., with a dedicated
flag, like with the
landlock_create_ruleset/LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION syscall?
>
> Thanks,
> Wei.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists