[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f8fde5e-68b6-6187-7051-7e51e58186c5@denx.de>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 18:55:39 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@...s.st.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@...s.st.com>,
Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre@...s.st.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...electronics.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: display: st,stm32-dsi: Remove
unnecessary fields
On 5/17/23 16:35, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
> "#address-cells" and "#size-cells" are two properties that are not
> mandatory. For instance, the DSI could refer to a bridge outside the scope
> of the node rather than include a 'panel@0' subnode. By doing so, address
> and size fields become then unnecessary, creating a warning at build time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@...s.st.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists