linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/6] riscv: allow kmalloc() caches aligned to the smallest value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230526165958.908-6-jszhang@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 27 May 2023 00:59:57 +0800
From:   Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
To:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Cc:     linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] riscv: allow kmalloc() caches aligned to the smallest value

Currently, riscv defines ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN as L1_CACHE_BYTES, I.E
64Bytes, if CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT=y. To support unified kernel
Image, usually we have to enable CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT, thus
it brings some bad effects to for coherent platforms:

Firstly, it wastes memory, kmalloc-96, kmalloc-32, kmalloc-16 and
kmalloc-8 slab caches don't exist any more, they are replaced with
either kmalloc-128 or kmalloc-64.

Secondly, larger than necessary kmalloc aligned allocations results
in unnecessary cache/TLB pressure.

This issue also exists on arm64 platforms. From last year, Catalin
tried to solve this issue by decoupling ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN from
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, limiting kmalloc() minimum alignment to
dma_get_cache_alignment() and replacing ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN usage
in various drivers with ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN etc.

One fact we can make use of for riscv: if the CPU doesn't support
ZICBOM or T-HEAD CMO, we know the platform is coherent. Based on
Catalin's work and above fact, we can easily solve the kmalloc align
issue for riscv: we can override dma_get_cache_alignment(), then let
it return ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN at the beginning and return 1 once we know
the underlying HW neither supports ZICBOM nor supports T-HEAD CMO.

So what about if the CPU supports ZICBOM and T-HEAD CMO, but all the
devices are dma coherent? Well, we use ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN as the
kmalloc minimum alignment, nothing changed in this case. This case
can be improved in the future.

After this patch, a simple test of booting to a small buildroot rootfs
on qemu shows:

kmalloc-96           5041    5041     96  ...
kmalloc-64           9606    9606     64  ...
kmalloc-32           5128    5128     32  ...
kmalloc-16           7682    7682     16  ...
kmalloc-8           10246   10246      8  ...

So we save about 1268KB memory. The saving will be much larger in normal
OS env on real HW platforms.

[1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230524171904.3967031-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com/

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h  | 14 ++++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h
index d3036df23ccb..2174fe7bac9a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@

 #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
 #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES
+#define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN	(8)
 #endif

 /*
@@ -23,4 +24,17 @@
 #define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN	16
 #endif

+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
+extern int dma_cache_alignment;
+#define dma_get_cache_alignment dma_get_cache_alignment
+static inline int dma_get_cache_alignment(void)
+{
+	return dma_cache_alignment;
+}
+#endif
+
+#endif	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+
 #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_CACHE_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
index 0e172e2b4751..21b553c299db 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>

 static bool noncoherent_supported __ro_after_init;
+int dma_cache_alignment __ro_after_init = ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_cache_alignment);

 void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
 			      enum dma_data_direction dir)
@@ -78,5 +80,7 @@ void riscv_noncoherent_supported(bool cmo)
 		WARN(!riscv_cbom_block_size,
 		     "Non-coherent DMA support enabled without a block size\n");
 		noncoherent_supported = true;
+	} else {
+		dma_cache_alignment = 1;
 	}
 }
-- 
2.40.1