linux-kernel - Re: x86 copy performance regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 May 2023 10:17:03 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86 copy performance regression

On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 10:00 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Let me go look at it some more. I *really* didn't want to make the
> code worse for ERMS

Oh well. I'll think about it some more in the hope that I can come up
with something clever that doesn't make objtool hate me, but in the
meantime let me just give you the "not clever" patch.

It generates an annoying six-byte jump when the small 2-byte one would
work just fine, but I guess only my pride is wounded.

              Linus

View attachment "patch.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (877 bytes)