linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] dt-bindings: sc16is7xx: Add property to change GPIO function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZHD6Rps5laEYfut4@surfacebook>
Date:   Fri, 26 May 2023 21:28:22 +0300
From:   andy.shevchenko@...il.com
To:     Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc:     andy.shevchenko@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, jirislaby@...nel.org, jringle@...dpoint.com,
        tomasz.mon@...lingroup.com, l.perczak@...lintechnologies.com,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] dt-bindings: sc16is7xx: Add property to change
 GPIO function

Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:34:43AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve kirjoitti:
> On Thu, 25 May 2023 14:11:22 +0300
> andy.shevchenko@...il.com wrote:
> > Thu, May 25, 2023 at 12:03:21AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve kirjoitti:

...

> > I'm wondering if we can convert this to YAML first and then add a new
> > property.
> 
> I also thought about it, then decided to focus on simply adding the new
> property first since I am not an expert in YAML.
> 
> I think it would be best to do it after this patch series. Keep in mind that
> the original intent of this patch series, and this new property, was to fix a
> regression related to the GPIOs, and I think that converting to YAML would
> simply delay and add much noise to the discussion at this point.

The patch doesn't have Fixes tag, so it's definitely not a fix. Also new
property can fix a regression, it's impossible to fix the users' DTBs.

> If someone wants to do it as a separate patch after this, fine. If not, I an
> willing to give it a go.

Not a DT maintainer here, I'm fine with either way.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko