[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2bb05623-9438-3b68-6ac8-4294f9676ff6@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 09:01:41 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Wu Bo <bo.wu@...o.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wubo.oduw@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] f2fs: fix args passed to trace_f2fs_lookup_end
On 2023/5/27 1:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/24, Wu Bo wrote:
>> The NULL return of 'd_splice_alias' dosen't mean error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <bo.wu@...o.com>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/namei.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
>> index 77a71276ecb1..e5a3e39ce90c 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
>> @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static struct dentry *f2fs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>> #endif
>> new = c(inode, dentry);
>> err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(new);
>> - trace_f2fs_lookup_end(dir, dentry, ino, !new ? -ENOENT : err);
>> + trace_f2fs_lookup_end(dir, new ? new : dentry, ino, err);
>
> Shouldn't give an error pointer to the dentry field.
>
> How about just giving the err?
>
> - err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(new);
> - trace_f2fs_lookup_end(dir, dentry, ino, !new ? -ENOENT : err);
> + trace_f2fs_lookup_end(dir, dentry, ino, PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(new));
static inline int __must_check PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(__force const void *ptr)
{
if (IS_ERR(ptr))
return PTR_ERR(ptr);
else
return 0;
}
For below two cases, PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(new) will return zero:
a) f2fs_lookup found existed dentry
b) f2fs_lookup didn't find existed dentry (-ENOENT case)
So in below commit, I passed -ENOENT to tracepoint for case b), so we can
distinguish result of f2fs_lookup in tracepoint, actually, -ENOENT is expected
value when we create a new file/directory.
Commit 84597b1f9b05 ("f2fs: fix wrong value of tracepoint parameter")
>
>
>> return new;
>> out_iput:
>> iput(inode);
>> --
>> 2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists