lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 27 May 2023 14:40:57 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] gpiolib: Unify allocation and initialization of GPIO valid mask

Now that the of_gpiochip_add() doesn't use valid mask, we may
unify GPIO valid mask allocation and initialization. With this
it makes a symmetry to the similar which we done for IRQ chip.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 25 ++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 6c8580d2454d..02bfe0f89871 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -485,18 +485,6 @@ static unsigned int gpiochip_count_reserved_ranges(struct gpio_chip *gc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int gpiochip_alloc_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *gc)
-{
-	if (!(gpiochip_count_reserved_ranges(gc) || gc->init_valid_mask))
-		return 0;
-
-	gc->valid_mask = gpiochip_allocate_mask(gc);
-	if (!gc->valid_mask)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int gpiochip_apply_reserved_ranges(struct gpio_chip *gc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &gc->gpiodev->dev;
@@ -537,6 +525,13 @@ static int gpiochip_init_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *gc)
 {
 	int ret;
 
+	if (!(gpiochip_count_reserved_ranges(gc) || gc->init_valid_mask))
+		return 0;
+
+	gc->valid_mask = gpiochip_allocate_mask(gc);
+	if (!gc->valid_mask)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	ret = gpiochip_apply_reserved_ranges(gc);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -863,7 +858,7 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_remove_from_list;
 
-	ret = gpiochip_alloc_valid_mask(gc);
+	ret = gpiochip_init_valid_mask(gc);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_remove_from_list;
 
@@ -871,10 +866,6 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_free_gpiochip_mask;
 
-	ret = gpiochip_init_valid_mask(gc);
-	if (ret)
-		goto err_remove_of_chip;
-
 	for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++) {
 		struct gpio_desc *desc = &gdev->descs[i];
 
-- 
2.40.0.1.gaa8946217a0b

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ