[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHIIIhtOAQRw4F40@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 16:39:46 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@...il.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, mazziesaccount@...il.com,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
lars@...afoo.de, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] iio: accel: kionix-kx022a: Refactor driver and
add chip_info structure
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 04:30:46PM +0200, Mehdi Djait wrote:
> Add the chip_info structure to the driver's private data to hold all
> the device specific infos.
> Refactor the kx022a driver implementation to make it more generic and
> extensible.
...
> - regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, &kx022a_regmap);
> + chip_info = device_get_match_data(&i2c->dev);
> + if (!chip_info) {
> + const struct i2c_device_id *id = i2c_client_get_device_id(i2c);
> + chip_info = (const struct kx022a_chip_info *)id->driver_data;
> + }
And if still no chip_info available?..
> + regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, chip_info->regmap_config);
> if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(regmap),
> "Failed to initialize Regmap\n");
...
> - if (val > KX022A_FIFO_LENGTH)
> - val = KX022A_FIFO_LENGTH;
> + if (val > data->chip_info->fifo_length)
> + val = data->chip_info->fifo_length;
min()/min_t() ?
...
> + ret = regmap_noinc_read(data->regmap, data->chip_info->buf_read,
> + &data->fifo_buffer[0], fifo_bytes);
data->fifo_buffer will suffice.
> if (ret)
> goto renable_out;
...
> + data->fifo_buffer = kmalloc(data->chip_info->fifo_length *
> + KX022A_FIFO_SAMPLES_SIZE_BYTES, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
Redundant blank line.
> + if (!data->fifo_buffer)
> + return -ENOMEM;
...
> +struct kx022a_chip_info {
> + const char *name;
> + const struct regmap_config *regmap_config;
> + const struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> + unsigned int num_channels;
> + unsigned int fifo_length;
> + u8 who;
> + u8 id;
> + u8 cntl;
> + u8 cntl2;
> + u8 odcntl;
> + u8 buf_cntl1;
> + u8 buf_cntl2;
> + u8 buf_clear;
> + u8 buf_status1;
Here is the gap since it's not a packed structure. Can we avoid it?
> + u16 buf_smp_lvl_mask;
> + u8 buf_read;
> + u8 inc1;
> + u8 inc4;
> + u8 inc5;
> + u8 inc6;
> + u8 xout_l;
> +};
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists