lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHN/u5hefVwsIdDN@nvidia.com>
Date:   Sun, 28 May 2023 13:22:19 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [suggestion] mm/gup: avoid IS_ERR_OR_NULL

On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 04:13:44PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 06:52:01AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 10:12:40AM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > > > No, this returning 0 on failure is a foot gun. Failing to pin a single
> > > > page is always an error, the only question is what sub reason caused
> > > > the error to happen. There is no third case where it is not an error.
> > >
> > > The uprobe path thinks otherwise, but maybe the answer is that we just need
> > > to -EFAULT on missing VMA and -EPERM on invalid flags.
> >
> > I think uprobe is just broken to think there is a third outcome. Let's
> > just fix it instead of trying to pretend it makes sense.
> 
> Sure, will take a look at that if I get a chance. We can at the very least
> adjust get_user_page_vma_remote() with this fixed.
> 
> Do you feel that a partially successful pinning for other GUP callers
> should equally be treated as an error (and pages unpinned -> return error
> code)? In that instance we'd need to audit things somewhat.

That seems more deeply ingrained at least, I'm not as keen to change
it as to get rid of the 0 return result.

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ