[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230528183221.36407e8d@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 18:32:21 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] iio: inkern: Check error explicitly in
iio_channel_read_max()
On Tue, 23 May 2023 17:12:17 +0200
Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com> wrote:
> The current implementation returns the error code as part of the
> default switch case.
> This can lead to returning an incorrect positive value in case of
> iio_avail_type enum entries evolution.
>
> In order to avoid this case, be more strict in error checking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
It's an odd code construct, so in the interests of robustness this
looks like a good improvement to me.
Given the later patch you need for this series will see some fuzz
I think if I pick this up separately I'll currently assume this whole
series will go together.
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/inkern.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/inkern.c b/drivers/iio/inkern.c
> index 872fd5c24147..f738db9a0c04 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/inkern.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/inkern.c
> @@ -858,6 +858,9 @@ static int iio_channel_read_max(struct iio_channel *chan,
> val2 = &unused;
>
> ret = iio_channel_read_avail(chan, &vals, type, &length, info);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> switch (ret) {
> case IIO_AVAIL_RANGE:
> switch (*type) {
> @@ -888,7 +891,7 @@ static int iio_channel_read_max(struct iio_channel *chan,
> return 0;
>
> default:
> - return ret;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists