linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] dt-bindings: bridge: samsung-dsim: Make some flags optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 28 May 2023 19:33:17 -0300
From:   Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:     Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        aford@...conembedded.com,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>,
        Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] dt-bindings: bridge: samsung-dsim: Make some flags optional

On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 10:27 AM Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
>
> In the event a device is connected to the samsung-dsim
> controller that doesn't support the burst-clock, the
> driver is able to get the requested pixel clock from the
> attached device or bridge.  In these instances, the
> samsung,burst-clock-frequency isn't needed, so remove
> it from the required list.
>
> The pll-clock frequency can be set by the device tree entry
> for samsung,pll-clock-frequency, but in some cases, the
> pll-clock may have the same clock rate as sclk_mipi clock.
> If they are equal, this flag is not needed since the driver
> will use the sclk_mipi rate as a fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
> V2:  Split from driver series.  Re-word updates for burst
> and pll-clock frequency.

Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>