[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230528061042.GA1234772@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 23:10:42 -0700
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
To: "Wen, Qian" <qian.wen@...el.com>
Cc: isaku.yamahata@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 002/113] KVM: x86/vmx: Refactor KVM VMX module
init/exit functions
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:23:57AM +0800,
"Wen, Qian" <qian.wen@...el.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> > index a59559ff140e..3f49e8e38b6b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> > @@ -165,3 +165,54 @@ struct kvm_x86_init_ops vt_init_ops __initdata = {
> > .runtime_ops = &vt_x86_ops,
> > .pmu_ops = &intel_pmu_ops,
> > };
> > +
> > +static int __init vt_init(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int vcpu_size, vcpu_align;
> > + int r;
> > +
> > + if (!kvm_is_vmx_supported())
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Note, hv_init_evmcs() touches only VMX knobs, i.e. there's nothing
> > + * to unwind if a later step fails.
> > + */
> > + hv_init_evmcs();
> > +
> > + r = kvm_x86_vendor_init(&vt_init_ops);
> > + if (r)
> > + return r;
> > +
> > + r = vmx_init();
> > + if (r)
> > + goto err_vmx_init;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Common KVM initialization _must_ come last, after this, /dev/kvm is
> > + * exposed to userspace!
> > + */
> > + vt_x86_ops.vm_size = sizeof(struct kvm_vmx);
>
> nit: why initialize vm_size again? I noticed that it has already been assigned a value when create vt_x86_ops.
Thanks, will remove the line.
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists