[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCBP_pniDTSwBuFBL8YA-GnCuDHn=nCMn9XHXs=_7DFjkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 22:23:33 +0200
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc: neil.armstrong@...aro.org, jbrunet@...libre.com,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, khilman@...libre.com,
jian.hu@...ogic.com, kernel@...rdevices.ru, rockosov@...il.com,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/6] clk: meson: a1: add Amlogic A1 PLL clock
controller driver
Hello Dmitry,
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 3:49 PM Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru> wrote:
>
> Hello Martin,
>
> As I promised before, I'm now back with the vendor's reply regarding
> AUDDDS. The information is still incomplete, but I have provided the
> available details below. Please take a look.
Great, thank you for following up!
[...]
> AUDDDS is a direct digital synthesizer used as a clock source. It is
> not used as default. You need to modify some clk registers in dts to
> enable it. Basically, it is used for audio.
>
> In A1 design, you can use AUD DDS as a clock source and it is not
> necessary. It is not used in the Amlogic default setting.
>
> According to the vendor, it is not necessary and is currently disabled
> by default. While we don't have much information about AUDDDS, the
> vendor suggests that it's not a commonly used clock object in A1
> projects and it may be skipped if not needed.
My goal is to make the dt-bindings match the hardware implementation...
> Based on all above information, I suppose we can skip it now.
...but in this case we simply don't have enough information (other
than some register names and a high level description that it can be
used as a clock) to do that.
I still think we did the best we could for now, so I agree with you:
let's skip it for now (and hope that retrofitting it later - if we
ever need it - won't be a problem).
Best regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists