linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add Samsung Galaxy Express

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <CSZ4NQFL3URD.I9QE8Q3018KI@Latitude-E6420>
Date:   Mon, 29 May 2023 18:50:25 -0400
From:   "Rudraksha Gupta" <guptarud@...il.com>
To:     "Conor Dooley" <conor@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        "Andy Gross" <agross@...nel.org>,
        "Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Vinod Koul" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        "Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@...nel.org>,
        "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>, "Olof Johansson" <olof@...om.net>,
        <soc@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add Samsung Galaxy
 Express

On Mon May 29, 2023 at 6:37 PM EDT, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 06:28:05PM -0400, Rudraksha Gupta wrote:
>
> > Gotcha, I will do that next time. Should I still send v2 in a separate
> > thread?
>
> That'd then be either [PATCH v3], or [RESEND PATCH v2]. Ideally v3 since
> you will have added the tags you received on v2.
> AFAIK Bjorn uses b4, which should be able to deal with the series as-is,
> but sending a v3 with the Acks etc would not be a bad idea. You
> should probably give it a couple days before doing that to see if it
> gets picked up before doing that.
>
> > Not sure if I should as I don't want to spam anyone.
>
> Sending new revisions of patches as a new thread is not spamming, we
> signed up to be maintainers, or get to email from the lists, after all.
> Sending several revisions of the same patches in a day would be spamming
> though, but that is not what we are talking about here ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.

Ah, I see. Thank you for being patient with me. I'm really excited to see my
patch go in! :)