[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6db7f89-bc62-9627-0bd1-1c66b72fc7dd@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 11:59:59 +0530
From: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
To: Li kunyu <kunyu@...china.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
<vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, <bsegall@...gle.com>, <mgorman@...e.de>,
<bristot@...hat.com>, <vschneid@...hat.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: deadline: Simplify
pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task()
On 5/30/2023 11:41 PM, Li kunyu wrote:
> Using the while statement instead of the if and goto statements is more
> concise and efficient.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li kunyu <kunyu@...china.com>
LGTM, Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
-- Mukesh
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index d823e608c7f0..b94a498f8cd9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -2112,15 +2112,13 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq, int cpu
>
> next_node = rb_first_cached(&rq->dl.pushable_dl_tasks_root);
>
> -next_node:
> - if (next_node) {
> + while (next_node) {
> p = __node_2_pdl(next_node);
>
> if (pick_dl_task(rq, p, cpu))
> return p;
>
> next_node = rb_next(next_node);
> - goto next_node;
> }
>
> return NULL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists