lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 29 May 2023 00:18:48 +0000
From:   Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To:     Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] ASoC: simple-card: Handle additional devices


Hi Herve

Thank you for the reply

> > 	static int __simple_for_each_link (...)
> > 	{
> > 		...
> > =>		add_devs = of_get_child_by_name(top, PREFIX "additional-devs");  
> > 		...
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	static int simple_populate_aux(...)
> > 	{
> > 		...
> > =>		node = of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node, PREFIX "additional-devs");  
> > 		...
> > 	}
> > 
> 
> Well, of_get_child_by_name() is called twice to retrieve the additional-devs
> node but for very different reason.
> 
> In __simple_for_each_link() to filter out the node as it has nothing to do with a DAI.
> In simple_populate_aux() to take care of the devices declared in the node.

I thought it is better to handling "device" and "filtering" in the same place,
if it has "additional-devs" on the DT. Because we don't need to filtering
if don't need to care about device.

But this is very small detail, not a big deal to discuss about for
a long time.

Thank you for your help !!

Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ