[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHRyA1BzK3KaGUEH@lpieralisi>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 11:36:03 +0200
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: kw@...ux.com, kishon@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] PCI: endpoint: Pass EPF device ID to the probe
function
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 08:12:09PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Currently, the EPF probe function doesn't get the device ID argument needed
> to correctly identify the device table ID of the EPF device.
>
> When multiple entries are added to the "struct pci_epf_device_id" table,
> the probe function needs to identify the correct one. And the only way to
> do so is by storing the correct device ID in "struct pci_epf" during
> "pci_epf_match_id()" and passing that to probe().
>
> Reviewed-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-ntb.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 8 +++++---
> include/linux/pci-epf.h | 4 +++-
> 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-ntb.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-ntb.c
> index 9a00448c7e61..980b4ecf19a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-ntb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-ntb.c
> @@ -2075,11 +2075,12 @@ static struct config_group *epf_ntb_add_cfs(struct pci_epf *epf,
> /**
> * epf_ntb_probe() - Probe NTB function driver
> * @epf: NTB endpoint function device
> + * @id: NTB endpoint function device ID
> *
> * Probe NTB function driver when endpoint function bus detects a NTB
> * endpoint function.
> */
> -static int epf_ntb_probe(struct pci_epf *epf)
> +static int epf_ntb_probe(struct pci_epf *epf, const struct pci_epf_device_id *id)
> {
> struct epf_ntb *ntb;
> struct device *dev;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index 0f9d2ec822ac..d5fcc78a5b73 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static const struct pci_epf_device_id pci_epf_test_ids[] = {
> {},
> };
>
> -static int pci_epf_test_probe(struct pci_epf *epf)
> +static int pci_epf_test_probe(struct pci_epf *epf, const struct pci_epf_device_id *id)
> {
> struct pci_epf_test *epf_test;
> struct device *dev = &epf->dev;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> index b7c7a8af99f4..122eb7a12028 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> @@ -1401,7 +1401,7 @@ static struct pci_epf_ops epf_ntb_ops = {
> *
> * Returns: Zero for success, or an error code in case of failure
> */
> -static int epf_ntb_probe(struct pci_epf *epf)
> +static int epf_ntb_probe(struct pci_epf *epf, const struct pci_epf_device_id *id)
> {
> struct epf_ntb *ntb;
> struct device *dev;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c
> index 2036e38be093..924564288c9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c
> @@ -494,11 +494,13 @@ static const struct device_type pci_epf_type = {
> };
>
> static int
> -pci_epf_match_id(const struct pci_epf_device_id *id, const struct pci_epf *epf)
> +pci_epf_match_id(const struct pci_epf_device_id *id, struct pci_epf *epf)
> {
> while (id->name[0]) {
> - if (strcmp(epf->name, id->name) == 0)
> + if (strcmp(epf->name, id->name) == 0) {
> + epf->id = id;
> return true;
> + }
> id++;
> }
I disagree with this patch's intent. The match function should not
change the parameters state. We should export this function to drivers
so that upon probe they can retrieve the matching id themselves,
as other bus interfaces do IMO.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> @@ -526,7 +528,7 @@ static int pci_epf_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>
> epf->driver = driver;
>
> - return driver->probe(epf);
> + return driver->probe(epf, epf->id);
> }
>
> static void pci_epf_device_remove(struct device *dev)
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-epf.h b/include/linux/pci-epf.h
> index a215dc8ce693..bc613f0df7e3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci-epf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci-epf.h
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ struct pci_epc_event_ops {
> * @id_table: identifies EPF devices for probing
> */
> struct pci_epf_driver {
> - int (*probe)(struct pci_epf *epf);
> + int (*probe)(struct pci_epf *epf, const struct pci_epf_device_id *id);
> void (*remove)(struct pci_epf *epf);
>
> struct device_driver driver;
> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ struct pci_epf_bar {
> * @epc: the EPC device to which this EPF device is bound
> * @epf_pf: the physical EPF device to which this virtual EPF device is bound
> * @driver: the EPF driver to which this EPF device is bound
> + * @id: Pointer to the EPF device ID
> * @list: to add pci_epf as a list of PCI endpoint functions to pci_epc
> * @lock: mutex to protect pci_epf_ops
> * @sec_epc: the secondary EPC device to which this EPF device is bound
> @@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ struct pci_epf {
> struct pci_epc *epc;
> struct pci_epf *epf_pf;
> struct pci_epf_driver *driver;
> + const struct pci_epf_device_id *id;
> struct list_head list;
> /* mutex to protect against concurrent access of pci_epf_ops */
> struct mutex lock;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists