linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] dsa: marvell: Add support for mv88e6071 and 6020 switches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230529105132.h673mnjddubl7und@skbuf>
Date:   Mon, 29 May 2023 13:51:32 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] dsa: marvell: Add support for mv88e6071 and 6020
 switches

Hello Lukasz,

On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 11:02:22AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> > After the commit (SHA1: 7e9517375a14f44ee830ca1c3278076dd65fcc8f);
> > "net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix max_mtu of 1492 on 6165, 6191, 6220, 6250,
> > 6290" the error when mv88e6020 or mv88e6071 is used is not present
> > anymore.
> > 
> 
> Are there any more comments for this patch set?

Has your email client eaten these comments too?

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/c39f4127-e1fe-4d38-83eb-f372ca2ebcd3@lunn.ch/
| On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 03:48:02PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
| > > > Vladimir indicates here that it is not known how to change the max MTU
| > > > for the MV88E6250. Where did you get the information from to implement
| > > > it?
| > > 
| > > Please refer to [1].
| > > 
| > > The mv88e6185_g1_set_max_frame_size() function can be reused (as
| > > registers' offsets and bits are the same for mv88e60{71|20}).
| > 
| > So you have the datasheet? You get the information to implement this
| > from the data sheet?
| > 
| >      Andrew

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZG4E+wd03cKipsib@shell.armlinux.org.uk/
| On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 01:37:15PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
| > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 02:17:43PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
| > > Please refer to [1].
| > > 
| > > The mv88e6185_g1_set_max_frame_size() function can be reused (as
| > > registers' offsets and bits are the same for mv88e60{71|20}).
| > > 
| > > After using Vladimir's patch there is no need to add max_frame size
| > > field and related patches from v6 can be dropped.
| > 
| > However, you haven't responded to:
| > 
| > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZGzP0qEjQkCFnXnr@shell.armlinux.org.uk/
| > 
| > to explain why what you're doing (adding this function) is safe.
| > 
| > Thanks.
| > 
| > -- 
| > RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
| > FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!