[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230529105707epcms5p1418eac680ebe1736196706b0db80dd39@epcms5p1>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 16:27:07 +0530
From: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
CC: "bcain@...cinc.com" <bcain@...cinc.com>,
"mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"npiggin@...il.com" <npiggin@...il.com>,
"christophe.leroy@...roup.eu" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"nathanl@...ux.ibm.com" <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>,
"ustavoars@...nel.org" <ustavoars@...nel.org>,
"alex.gaynor@...il.com" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
"gary@...yguo.net" <gary@...yguo.net>,
"ojeda@...nel.org" <ojeda@...nel.org>,
"pmladek@...e.com" <pmladek@...e.com>,
"wedsonaf@...gle.com" <wedsonaf@...gle.com>,
"linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Onkarnath <onkarnath.1@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] arch:hexagon/powerpc: use KSYM_NAME_LEN in array
size
Hi,
>>
>> kallsyms_lookup which in turn calls for kallsyms_lookup_buildid()
>> writes on index "KSYM_NAME_LEN - 1".
>>
>> Thus array size should be KSYM_NAME_LEN.
>>
>> for powerpc and hexagon it was defined as "128" directly.
>> and commit '61968dbc2d5d' changed define value to 512,
>> So both were missed to update with new size.
>>
>> Fixes: 61968dbc2d5d ("kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512")
>> Signed-off-by: Onkarnath <onkarnath.1@...sung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
> Thanks for this!
>
> There is no `From:` at the top. Since I cannot locate the patch in
> Lore, did you mean to put both of you as authors perhaps? In that
> case, please use a `Co-developed-by` as needed.
>
I Will add co-developed-by` tag.
because this change was identified while we were working on kallsyms some time back.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YonTOL4zC4CytVrn@infradead.org/t/
this patch set is pending and we will start working on that again, so i thought better
to send bugfix first.
> Perhaps it is a good idea to submit each arch independently, too.
>
ok, I will share 2 separate patches.
> The changes themselves look fine on a quick inspection, though the
> `xmon.c` one is a global buffer (and there is another equally-sized
> buffer in `xmon.c` with a hard-coded `128` constant that would be nice
> to clarify).
Yes, I think second buffer was not related to kallsyms, so I have not touched that.
Thanks,
Maninder Singh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists