linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 May 2023 14:21:57 +0100
From:   Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To:     Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN ->
 &blsp_uartN

On 29/05/2023 13:46, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
> behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
> This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
> 
> Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
> not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
> correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
> 
> End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
> There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>