[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1f5e719-5b38-a258-2778-5dfe9a7dcf5e@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 14:47:30 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8916: Rename &wcd_codec ->
&pm8916_codec
On 29/05/2023 13:47, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> All definitions in pm8916.dtsi use the &pm8916_ label suffix, only the
That's a prefix_ not a _suffix
> codec uses the &wcd_codec label. &wcd_codec is confusing because the
> codec on MSM8916 is split into a "wcd-digital" and "wcd-analog" part
> and both could be described with &wcd_codec.
>
> Let's just name it &pm8916_codec so it's consistent with all other PMIC
> device nodes.
I'm not sure that's really consistent throught the dts/yaml TBH but, I
do think the pm8196 name is more meaningful and clear.
What is wcd supposed to stand for anyway ? Its probably obvious but I
prefer pm8916_code since that *is* obvious.
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
Seems like a valid change but, consider amending your commit log.
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists