lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6474b526.050a0220.baa3e.31c1@mx.google.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 May 2023 16:09:39 +0200
From:   Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 03/13] Documentation: leds: leds-class:
 Document new Hardware driven LEDs APIs

On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 08:12:42AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> writes:
> 
> >> +    - hw_control_get_device:
> >> +                return the device associated with the LED driver in
> >> +                hw control. A trigger might use this to match the
> >> +                returned device from this function with a configured
> >> +                device for the trigger as the source for blinking
> >> +                events and correctly enable hw control.
> >> +                (example a netdev trigger configured to blink for a
> >> +                particular dev match the returned dev from get_device
> >> +                to set hw control)
> >> +
> >> +                Return a device or NULL if nothing is currently attached.
> > Returns a device name?
> 
> The return type of this function is struct device * - how would you
> expect it to return a name?
> 

Just to clarify, a device name can't be returned. Not every device have
a name and such name can be changed. An example is network device where
you can change the name of the interface.

Using the device prevents all of this problem. 

-- 
	Ansuel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ