[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHS-HSgaBxMXiKy9@gerhold.net>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 17:00:54 +0200
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Clean up MDSS labels
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 02:33:43PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 29/05/2023 13:47, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > Right now MDSS related definitions cannot be properly grouped together
> > in board DTs because the labels do not use consistent prefixes. The DSI
> > PHY label is particularly weird because the DSI number is at the end
> > (&dsi_phy0) while DSI itself is called &dsi0.
> >
> > Follow the example of more recent SoCs and give all the MDSS related
> > nodes a consistent label that allows proper grouping.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
> > ---
>
> You should probably churn the yaml that goes with this..
>
Do you mean update the examples in the yaml bindings or what exactly?
Will take a look at those in a separate change (DT bindings don't make
any definitions about labels so it's not strictly related). From a quick
look it even seems like the labels are even omitted mostly in the
bindings.
Thanks,
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists