linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Clean up MDSS labels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 May 2023 17:00:54 +0200
From:   Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
To:     Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Clean up MDSS labels

On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 02:33:43PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 29/05/2023 13:47, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > Right now MDSS related definitions cannot be properly grouped together
> > in board DTs because the labels do not use consistent prefixes. The DSI
> > PHY label is particularly weird because the DSI number is at the end
> > (&dsi_phy0) while DSI itself is called &dsi0.
> > 
> > Follow the example of more recent SoCs and give all the MDSS related
> > nodes a consistent label that allows proper grouping.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
> > ---
> 
> You should probably churn the yaml that goes with this..
> 

Do you mean update the examples in the yaml bindings or what exactly?

Will take a look at those in a separate change (DT bindings don't make
any definitions about labels so it's not strictly related). From a quick
look it even seems like the labels are even omitted mostly in the
bindings.

Thanks,
Stephan