lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230529-florist-hardiness-be5de59e660c@spud>
Date:   Mon, 29 May 2023 19:09:39 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        jirislaby@...nel.org, jringle@...dpoint.com,
        l.perczak@...lintechnologies.com, tomasz.mon@...lingroup.com,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] dt-bindings: sc16is7xx: Add property to change
 GPIO function

On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 10:26:01AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2023 15:16:47 +0100
> Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hey Hugo,
> > 
> > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 10:07:08AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> > > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> > > 
> > > Some variants in this series of UART controllers have GPIO pins that
> > > are shared between GPIO and modem control lines.
> > > 
> > > The pin mux mode (GPIO or modem control lines) can be set for each
> > > ports (channels) supported by the variant.
> > > 
> > > This adds a property to the device tree to set the GPIO pin mux to
> > > modem control lines on selected ports if needed.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> > 
> > Did I not ack this in v2? I didn't notice a reason for dropping it
> > in the cover etc. Was it intentionally dropped, or missed?

> In v3, I slighly modified the example, and that is why I didn't copy your ack.

Ah, I would say that for "slight modifications" when you have an ack,
you could keep it - but everyone is different and dropping tags is
likely to piss people off less than keeping them, so I understand
sticking on the safe side.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ