[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92d5a699-9f5d-2e40-ca73-4604f3e5a657@foss.st.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 15:30:32 +0200
From: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@...s.st.com>
CC: <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre@...s.st.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
<kernel@...electronics.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@...s.st.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: display: st,stm32-dsi: Remove
unnecessary fields
On 5/30/23 14:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2023 11:13:57 +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
>> "#address-cells" and "#size-cells" are two properties that are not
>> mandatory. For instance, the DSI could refer to a bridge outside the scope
>> of the node rather than include a 'panel@0' subnode. By doing so, address
>> and size fields become then unnecessary, creating a warning at build time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@...s.st.com>
>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-dsi.yaml | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> incorrect. These may not be new warnings
I checked it before merging the series on stm32-next tree. I didn't get
this error. I didn't check commit per commit.
Do you get this error after merging the whole series ?
>
> Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
> This will change in the future.
>
> Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1787034
>
>
> dsi@...16c00: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('panel-dsi@0' was unexpected)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dtb
>
> dsi@...00000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('panel-dsi@0' was unexpected)
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dtb
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1-scmi.dtb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists