[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230530-duller-reset-a34ae111f207@wendy>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 15:12:12 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
CC: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>, <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>,
Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@...c27.com>,
Rick Chen <rick@...estech.com>, Leo <ycliang@...estech.com>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <qemu-riscv@...gnu.org>,
<u-boot@...ts.denx.de>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: riscv: deprecate riscv,isa
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:42:34PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 02:30:53PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Why not just have something like
> >
> > mycpu {
> > ...
> > riscv,isa {
> > i;
> > m;
> > a;
> > zicsr;
> > ...
> > };
> > };
>
> Naming of the node aside (perhaps that could be riscv,isa-extensions)
> there's not something hitting me immediately as to why that is a no-no.
> If the size is a concern, this would certainly be more efficient & not
> like the probing would be anything other than trivial more difficult
> what I have in my proposal.
Having started messing around with this, one of the main advantages, to
me, of this approach is proper validation.
cpus.yaml has additionalProperties: true in it, which would have had to
be sorted out, or worked around, but creating a child-node with the
properties in it allows setting additionalProperties: false.
> Rob's AFK at the moment, and I was hoping that he would take a look at
> the idea, so I won't respin til he is back, but I'll give this a go in
> the interim.
Mechanically, the conversion of the patch isn't difficult, but I'll still
wait for Rob to come back before sending a v2. But that v2 will more
than likely implement your suggestion.
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists