linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: i2c: imx-lpi2c: Add bus recovery example

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ed004607-5a23-564a-3185-a63af87783e5@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2023 16:58:32 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     carlos.song@....com, aisheng.dong@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, Anson.Huang@....com
Cc:     xiaoning.wang@....com, haibo.chen@....com, linux-imx@....com,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: i2c: imx-lpi2c: Add bus recovery example

On 29/05/2023 09:43, carlos.song@....com wrote:
> From: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>
> 
> Add i2c bus recovery configuration example.

Why? That's just example... also with coding style issue.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Song <carlos.song@....com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml   | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml
> index 4656f5112b84..62ee457496e4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml
> @@ -58,6 +58,16 @@ properties:
>    power-domains:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +  pinctrl-names:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 3

What's the benefit of this? Entries should be defined but without it is
not really helpful. Anyway not explained in commit msg.

> +
> +  scl-gpios:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  sda-gpios:
> +    maxItems: 1

You don't need these two. Anyway not explained in commit msg.

> +
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
> @@ -70,6 +80,7 @@ examples:
>    - |
>      #include <dt-bindings/clock/imx7ulp-clock.h>
>      #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>  
>      i2c@...50000 {
>          compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-lpi2c";
> @@ -78,4 +89,9 @@ examples:
>          interrupts = <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>          clocks = <&clks IMX7ULP_CLK_LPI2C7>,
>                   <&clks IMX7ULP_CLK_NIC1_BUS_DIV>;
> +        pinctrl-names = "default","gpio";

Missing space.

> +        pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c>;
> +        pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_i2c_recovery>;
> +        scl-gpios = <&gpio5 14 (GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>;
> +        sda-gpios = <&gpio5 15 (GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>;
>      };

Best regards,
Krzysztof