[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230530114158.f74f014234fbffb1026f06e1@hugovil.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 11:41:58 -0400
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To: andy.shevchenko@...il.com
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, jringle@...dpoint.com,
l.perczak@...lintechnologies.com, tomasz.mon@...lingroup.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] serial: sc16is7xx: fix GPIO regression and rs485
improvements
On Tue, 30 May 2023 14:15:39 +0300
andy.shevchenko@...il.com wrote:
> Mon, May 29, 2023 at 10:07:08PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve kirjoitti:
> > On Tue, 30 May 2023 01:31:28 +0300
> > andy.shevchenko@...il.com wrote:
> > > Mon, May 29, 2023 at 10:07:02AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve kirjoitti:
> > > > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > > this patch series mainly fixes a GPIO regression and improve RS485 flags and
> > > > properties detection from DT.
> > > >
> > > > It now also includes various small fixes and improvements that were previously
> > > > sent as separate patches, but that made testing everything difficult.
> > > >
> > > > Patch 1 fixes an issue when debugging IOcontrol register. After testing the GPIO
> > > > regression patches (patches 6 and 7, tests done by Lech Perczak), it appers that
> > > > this patch is also necessary for having the correct IOcontrol register values.
> > > >
> > > > Patch 2 introduces a delay after a reset operation to respect datasheet
> > > > timing recommandations.
> > >
> > > These two patches are w/o Fixes tag, they should be moved in the series further
> > > as I explained before.
> >
> > Your explanation was not clear.
>
> Sorry if it feels like this. The documentation should have more clarity
> on the matter.
>
> > Anyway, I moved them in position 7 and 8.
>
> Thank you, but take also what Greg KH replied to you into consideration.
> He is the maintainer and seems other patches needs some additional work
> in the scope of Fixes / backport (see stable kernel patches flow in the
> kernel documentation, which I also mentioned earlier).
Hi,
will do.
Thank you,.
Hugo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists