linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: introduce DRM_AMDGPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM6PR12MB3996064F09E1C2FD782CC944834B9@DM6PR12MB3996.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2023 15:50:32 +0000
From:   "Ho, Kenny" <Kenny.Ho@....com>
To:     "Mahfooz, Hamza" <Hamza.Mahfooz@....com>,
        "amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
CC:     "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
        "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "Kuehling, Felix" <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
        "Wentland, Harry" <Harry.Wentland@....com>,
        André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
        Andrew Davis <afd@...com>, Peter Foley <pefoley2@...oley.com>,
        "Zhang, Hawking" <Hawking.Zhang@....com>, "Ma, Le" <Le.Ma@....com>,
        "Zhou1, Tao" <Tao.Zhou1@....com>,
        "Lazar, Lijo" <Lijo.Lazar@....com>,
        "Zhu, James" <James.Zhu@....com>,
        "Chai, Thomas" <YiPeng.Chai@....com>,
        "Li, Candice" <Candice.Li@....com>,
        "Wang, Yang(Kevin)" <KevinYang.Wang@....com>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: introduce DRM_AMDGPU_WERROR

[Public]

On 5/30/23 11:24, Hamza Mahfooz wrote:
> I am able to get clean builds with this enabled on GCC 11-13 and Clang
> 15, at least as of commit e786aef0869c ("drm/amd/display: remove unused
> definition") on amd-staging-drm-next.

Did you try intentionally introducing a warning to see if the build indeed fail?