[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kjcmnmspnpzp7j64msdeygfv76fah5whslldczlfzlk57cxp7b@myllnwmy43vo>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 09:27:14 -0700
From: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
To: Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de>
Cc: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@...bus.com>,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [tpm, tpm_tis] e644b2f498: RIP:acpi_safe_halt
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 04:40:26PM +0200, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 13:58 -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 05:07:54PM +0200, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > > Hi Jerry,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 07:59 -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > IIRC trying to catch the irq storm didn't work in the L490 case for
> > > > some reason, so we might still need the dmi entry for that one.
> > > >
> > > > The info that the T490s had a pin wired up wrong came from Lenovo, but
> > > > this one even looks to be a different vendor so I wonder how often
> > > > this happens or if there is something else going on. Is it possible to
> > > > get info about the tpm used in the Inspur system? The datasheet online
> > > > doesn't mention it.
> > >
> > > Are you sure about T490s? To me the wiring looks right on both s and non-s:
> > > Pin
> > > 18 / PIRQ# goes to PIRQA# of the PCH/SoC.
> > >
> > > However on L490 Pin 18 / PIRQ# is wired wrongly to SERIRQ, which probably is
> > > the
> > > reason that catching the interrupt storm didn't work: I guess this
> > > completely
> > > messes up LPC communication and causes way more problems. In this case only
> > > a
> > > DMI quirk can help.
> > >
> > > BR
> > > Michael
> > >
> >
> > I'm searching to see if I can find the old bug/email where that info
> > from Lenovo originated. It could be that the info was wrong, and
> > it was some firmware issue instead. IIRC the the T490s issue could be
> > solved with the code looking for the irq storm, but the L490 needed
> > the dmi check even with the irq storm checking code.
>
> Tbh I wonder why the T490s suffers from that interrupt storm at all, but that
> might be a FW bug (it's not handling the interrupt). L490 definitely needs that
> DMI check, right.
>
> >
> >
> > I haven't found the info yet, but I did find some other reports from back
> > then.
> >
> > Spurious irq reported with 5.5.7, so after the irq reverts in v5.5:
> >
> > tpm_tis IFX0785:00: 2.0 TPM
> > Hardware name: Entroware Proteus/Proteus, BIOS 1.07.07TE0 11/15/2019
>
> That's actually a Clevo N151CU. According to schematics it's wired correctly to
> PIRQA#, so probably a FW bug as well.
>
> >
> > Thinkpad P53
> > tpm_tis STM7308:00: 2.0 TPM
> > Hardware name: LENOVO 20QNCTO1WW/20QNCTO1WW, BIOS N2NET34W (1.19 ) 11/28/2019
> >
> >
> >
> > Reports from before the 5.5 reverts:
> >
> > tpm_tis MSFT0101:00: 2.0 TPM
> > Hyperbook NH5/Clevo NH55RCQ
>
> PIRQ# wired to GPP_B0 - needs correct setup in firmware -> probably a firmware
> bug.
>
> >
> > tpm_tis IFX0785:00: 2.0 TPM
> > Clevo N151CU-derived notebook
>
> Same device as Entroware Proteus.
>
Hi Michael,
Out of curiousity, where are you grabbing the schematics from?
Regards,
Jerry
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jerry
> >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jerry
> > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Lukas
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists