[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <168546844863.691057.3696427751922501531.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 18:40:48 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Boerge Struempfel <boerge.struempfel@...il.com>
Cc: bstruempfel@...ratronik.de, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
festevam@...il.com, amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] spi: add SPI_MOSI_IDLE_LOW mode bit
On Wed, 24 May 2023 11:19:43 +0200, Boerge Struempfel wrote:
> Some spi controller switch the mosi line to high, whenever they are
> idle. This may not be desired in all use cases. For example neopixel
> leds can get confused and flicker due to misinterpreting the idle state.
> Therefore, we introduce a new spi-mode bit, with which the idle behaviour
> can be overwritten on a per device basis.
>
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/5] spi: add SPI_MOSI_IDLE_LOW mode bit
commit: fe73245592fef75a7c41180a3fbb07c9a75f622e
[2/5] spi: spi-imx: add support for SPI_MOSI_IDLE_LOW mode bit
commit: 6a983ff5102ff0d859df05ca3f5cf2f6a17c0fad
[3/5] spi: spidev: add two new spi mode bits
commit: 5cc223ca4858ec40bd2b8522ebc51c0d4963e51f
[4/5] spi: spidev_test: Sorted the options into logical groups
commit: 113f36f2dce3a5a1aacbfa700c44080ec37ee3a0
[5/5] spi: spidev_test Add three missing spi mode bits
commit: b229a7f530ebea90c8e21b56872f3102e3d54461
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists