[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3af407e3-76a4-23df-8742-8f7b9a98f088@omp.ru>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 23:51:38 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/41] ata: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies
Hello!
On 5/16/23 1:59 PM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> those drivers using them.
>
> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Note: The HAS_IOPORT Kconfig option was added in v6.4-rc1 so
> per-subsystem patches may be applied independently
>
> drivers/ata/Kconfig | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/ata/ata_generic.c | 2 ++
> drivers/ata/libata-sff.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/libata.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/Kconfig b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> index 42b51c9812a0..c521cdc51f8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
[...]
Shouldn't there be an entry for the ATIIXP driver here? It doesn't
call in*/out*() but it does call ata_bmdma_{start|stop}() that call
ioread*/iowrite*()...
And shouldn't there be an entry for APT867x driver too? It does call
ioread*/iowrite*()...
[...]
Shouldn't there be an entry for the HPT3x3 driver too? It does call
ioread*/iowrite*()... and also for the IT821x driver? And the Marvall
driver?
> @@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ config PATA_MPC52xx
>
> config PATA_NETCELL
> tristate "NETCELL Revolution RAID support"
> - depends on PCI
> + depends on PCI && HAS_IOPORT
Not clear why -- because it calls ata_pci_bmdma_clear_simplex()?
[...]
Shouldn't there be an entry for the NS87415 driver too? It does
call ioread*/iowrite*()...
[...]
> @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ config PATA_SCH
>
> config PATA_SERVERWORKS
> tristate "SERVERWORKS OSB4/CSB5/CSB6/HT1000 PATA support"
> - depends on PCI
> + depends on PCI && HAS_IOPORT
Not clear why -- because it calls ata_pci_bmdma_clear_simplex()?
[...]
Shouldn't there be an entry for the VIA driver too? It does call
ioread*/iowrite*()... and SiL680 driver too... and Winbond SL82C105
driver too... and OPTi PIO driver too... and PCMCIA driver too...
[...]
> @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ config ATA_GENERIC
>
> config PATA_LEGACY
> tristate "Legacy ISA PATA support (Experimental)"
> - depends on (ISA || PCI)
> + depends on (ISA || PCI) && HAS_IOPORT
> select PATA_TIMINGS
Hm, won't it override the HAS_IOPORT dependency, if you enable
PATA_QDI or PATA_WINBOD_VLB?
> help
> This option enables support for ISA/VLB/PCI bus legacy PATA
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ata_generic.c b/drivers/ata/ata_generic.c
> index 2f57ec00ab82..2d391d117f74 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ata_generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ata_generic.c
This driver calls ioread8() as well...
> @@ -197,8 +197,10 @@ static int ata_generic_init_one(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id
> if (!(command & PCI_COMMAND_IO))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PATA_ALI
This #ifdef doesn't make sense to me -- pata_ali.c will call
the below function anyway, no?
> if (dev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_AL)
> ata_pci_bmdma_clear_simplex(dev);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PATA_ALI */
> if (dev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI) {
> int rc = pcim_enable_device(dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
> index 9d28badfe41d..80137edb7ebf 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
> @@ -3031,6 +3031,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_bmdma_port_start32);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
> /**
> * ata_pci_bmdma_clear_simplex - attempt to kick device out of simplex
> * @pdev: PCI device
> @@ -3056,6 +3057,7 @@ int ata_pci_bmdma_clear_simplex(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_pci_bmdma_clear_simplex);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT */
>
> static void ata_bmdma_nodma(struct ata_host *host, const char *reason)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
> index 311cd93377c7..90002d4a785b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/libata.h
> +++ b/include/linux/libata.h
> @@ -2012,7 +2012,9 @@ extern int ata_bmdma_port_start(struct ata_port *ap);
> extern int ata_bmdma_port_start32(struct ata_port *ap);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
> extern int ata_pci_bmdma_clear_simplex(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT */
Hm, wouldn't it be better if you used #else and declare an inline
variant of this function simply retirning an error?
[...]
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists