[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6323987-059e-5396-20b9-8b6a1687e289@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 16:13:52 -0500
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sabin Rapan <sabrapan@...zon.com>,
"Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86/smpboot: Disable parallel bootup if cc_vendor != NONE
On 5/30/23 15:39, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, May 30 2023 at 15:03, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> On 5/30/23 14:51, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> That aside. From a semantical POV making this decision about parallel
>>> bootup based on some magic CC encryption attribute is questionable.
>>>
>>> I'm tending to just do the below and make this CC agnostic (except that
>>> I couldn't find the right spot for SEV-ES to clear that flag.)
>>
>> Maybe in sme_sev_setup_real_mode() in arch/x86/realmode/init.c? You could
>> clear the flag within the CC_ATTR_GUEST_STATE_ENCRYPT check.
>
> Eeew.
>
> Can we please have a AMD SEV-ES init specific place and not hijack some
> random code which has to check CC_ATTR_GUEST_STATE_ENCRYPT?
As long as it's not too early, you could try sme_early_init() in
arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_amd.c. Add a check for sev_status &
MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_ENABLED and clear the flag.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists