linux-kernel - Re: Revert "module: error out early on concurrent load of the same module file"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=whWJFw8+HP=0-ZaQYq2VVPtv1StFhUxgiJW1_FWdtgJSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2023 17:56:55 -0400
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, mcgrof@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Revert "module: error out early on concurrent load of the same
 module file"

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 5:43 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>
> [ add linux-cxl ]
>
> Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after building Linux v6.4-rc4 I can NOT boot into my Debian GNU/Linux
> > AMD64 system with root-ext4 (/dev/sdc2 - of course using UUID in
> > /etc/fstab).
>
> I did not find a mailing-list thread for "9828ed3f695a module: error out early
> on concurrent load of the same module file", so replying here.

It is this thread:

   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230524213620.3509138-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/

which initially proposed a different solution, then that "just reject
concurrent loads", and after that caused problems, there's yet another
proposal at

   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wg7ihygotpO9x5a6QJO5oAom9o91==L_Kx-gUHvRYuXiQ@mail.gmail.com/

although if you want to try out that approach, Johan pointed out a
missing initialization of a spinlock in that patch in a reply there.

> Just wanted to highlight this a test case for the next attempt at this
> fix.

See above: the next attempt won't be until 6.5, but if you saw the
failure on your test-cases, it might be a good idea to check out that
next attempt early..

               Linus