linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] block layer patches for bcachefs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 May 2023 19:30:19 -0400
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] block layer patches for bcachefs

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 10:50:55AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Sorry typo, I meant text. Just checked stack and it looks identical, but
> things like blk-map grows ~6% more text, and bio ~3%. Didn't check all
> of them, but at least those two are consistent across x86-64 and
> aarch64. Ditto on the data front. Need to take a closer look at where
> exactly that is coming from, and what that looks like.

Weird - when I looked kernel text size was unchanged, it was data that
increased with the earlier version of the patch due to a new WARN_ON().
I'll have another look.