[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30832bc4-c5b9-9131-2450-3522197ee05d@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 12:45:08 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>,
agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
jassisinghbrar@...il.com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, quic_gurus@...cinc.com,
loic.poulain@...aro.org, quic_eberman@...cinc.com,
robimarko@...il.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc: quic_srichara@...cinc.com, quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com,
quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com, quic_kathirav@...cinc.com,
quic_arajkuma@...cinc.com, quic_anusha@...cinc.com,
quic_poovendh@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add support for
multipd model
On 18/05/2023 19:22, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>>>
>> It's not required. I am going to remove it.
>>>> + reg:
>>>> + maxItems: 1
>>>> +
>>>> + interrupts-extended:
>>>
>>> Instead interrupts
>>>
>> Sure. I will use 'interrupts'.
>>
> Please discard my previous reply. Here i couldn't able to use
> 'interrupts' because i am using interrupts from two different interrupt
> controllers. Sorry for previous wrong reply.
The bindings still should have interrupts. I did not comment on DTS, but
on bindings. interrupts imply (or allow) interrupts-extended.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists