[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zg5mrt8m.fsf@mail.lhotse>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 20:47:21 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, mirimmad@...look.com
Cc: Immad Mir <mirimmad17@...il.com>,
Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix debugfs_create_dir error checking
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 01:16:44PM +0530, mirimmad@...look.com wrote:
>> From: Immad Mir <mirimmad17@...il.com>
>>
>> The debugfs_create_dir returns ERR_PTR incase of an error and the
>> correct way of checking it by using the IS_ERR inline function, and
>> not the simple null comparision. This patch fixes this.
>>
>> Suggested-By: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Immad Mir <mirimmad17@...il.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-xscom.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-xscom.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-xscom.c
>> index 6b4eed2ef..262cd6fac 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-xscom.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-xscom.c
>> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int scom_debug_init_one(struct dentry *root, struct device_node *dn,
>> ent->path.size = strlen((char *)ent->path.data);
>>
>> dir = debugfs_create_dir(ent->name, root);
>> - if (!dir) {
>> + if (IS_ERR(dir)) {
>> kfree(ent->path.data);
>> kfree(ent);
>> return -1;
>
> Why is this driver caring if debugfs is working or not at all? It
> should just ignore the error and keep moving forward.
It's creating directories and then creating files in those directories.
So I think it makes sense that it checks that the directory was created
successfully. It doesn't check whether the files were created.
> And -1 is not a valid error number :(
It's EPERM :) - but yeah probably not really the right error in this
case.
Still I think this patch is an improvement so I'll plan to merge it.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists