linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 04/13] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-ipq5018: remove q6 clocks macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <514a9e26-aeb9-ce05-1055-337646098ec1@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2023 13:01:55 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>,
        agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
        mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
        sboyd@...nel.org, quic_eberman@...cinc.com, quic_mojha@...cinc.com,
        kvalo@...nel.org, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     quic_srichara@...cinc.com, quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com,
        quic_kathirav@...cinc.com, quic_anusha@...cinc.com,
        quic_poovendh@...cinc.com, quic_varada@...cinc.com,
        quic_devipriy@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 04/13] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-ipq5018: remove q6
 clocks macros

On 22/05/2023 00:28, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
> Since Q6 firmware takes care of bring up clocks in multipd
> model, remove bring up clock macros.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq5018.h | 21 --------------------
>  1 file changed, 21 deletions(-)
> 

I am fine with this if it still compiles... I have doubts about it,
unless of some depedencies (you mentioned three !)... but then it gets
complicated.

Keep patches doing same logical change in same patchset. This dependency
dance in recent submissions is making things tricky and prolonging your
upstreaming process significantly.

Best regards,
Krzysztof